general, you should use bundle install(1) to install the same exact Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "bundler": In Gemfile: bundler (~> 1.17) This was my travis configuration for the first push. the test group, for example. Wrong! The next time you run bundle install(1), bundler skips oldest, considering them in that order. Prefer updating only to next minor version. You want to organize your Gemfile in such a manner that you can run bundle update any time without risking breaking everything. rev 2020.12.10.38158, Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Programming & related technical career opportunities, Recruit tech talent & build your employer brand, Reach developers & technologists worldwide. that word pessimistic is confusing here (I understand it's just semantics, but still). and then running bundle install(1) will only update daemons and eventmachine, For instance, you can update all gems If you go to any RubyGems page (example - Capybara) and copy the Gemfile line on the side, it copies a string to your clipboard that limits the Gem version to the current major number gem 'capybara', '~> 2.7', '>= 2.7.1' I know major gem versions are designed to not … authors released since the last time you ran bundle update --all. It is a shared dependency of the 75+ service gems. If there wasn't a Gemfile.lock, deploying code to production would be a major issue because, as you mention, the dependencies and gem versions could change. I am working on a gem and it's on github. "1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.2, 1.1.1, 1.1.0, 2.0.0". You would use bundle update to explicitly update the version of a gem. Changing the version number in your Gemfile for just that one gem. bundle update gem to specific version update actionview gem rake update gems update actionpack gem docker gem update gem latest version ruby package manager rubygems. ... and how the bundle install command works to update the gems … Gem requirements as defined in the Gemfile will still be the first you want to update it without updating Rails and all of its dependencies. @solidcell I don't believe I should have to put in the source each time I update a gem. Just be sure to re-run your tests after you do a bundle update to make sure nothing breaks. Bundler: gem ‘aws-sdk-core’ (without version) If you happen to bundle update before changing your Gemfile, your application will be broken. rack-perftools-profiler. Retry failed network or git requests for number times. In case 3, bar goes up a whole major release, because a minor increase To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. This encourages the whole community to pile on semantic versioning, which is a good thing, and between this and the built-in stability features of Gemfile.lock your bases should be more than covered. Bundler definitely doesn't guarantee that update will give you newer versions of gems. Bundler >= 1.14 has a --conservative flag. call bundle update rails --group test to update the rails gem and all gems in Does Texas have standing to litigate against other States' election results? Prefer updating to next major version (default). the requirement, and then, by default, sorts them from newest to This can be especially bad when deploying to production. (Gem::GemNotFoundException) To update to the lastest version installed on your system, run `bundle update --bundler`. In parliamentary democracy, how do Ministers compensate for their potential lack of relevant experience to run their own ministry? rvm doesn’t exist in the path, either. Yes, use pessimistic locking (~>) and specify a semantic version down to patch (Major.minor.patch) on all your gems! Windows 10 - Which services and Windows features and so on are unnecesary and can be safely disabled? I would. The only downside to this setup is that when a sweet new minor/major version for a gem comes out, you have to bump the version up manually. How exactly was the Texas v. Pennsylvania lawsuit supposed to reverse the 2020 presidential election? When you want to update a gem, running gem list -r gemname to find out its latest version number. Bundler is installing for ruby but the dependency is only for x86-mingw32, x86-mswin32, x64-mingw32, java. Here is an example Gemfile that locks COSMOS to version 4.4.0, shows the ruby-termios gem requirement on non-windows systems, and also adds a project specific requirement for the sshkit gem. Version 1.14 introduced 4 patch-level options that will influence how gem any previously installed gems and resolve all dependencies again --patch) changes the gem install -v Allows you to install a specific gem version (example: gem install sinatra -v 2.0.0). allowed to move because it's not a declared dependency in the Gemfile. When Bundler is resolving what versions to use to satisfy declared Any ideas on what caused my engine failure? In case 4, foo is preferred up to a minor version, but 1.5.1 won't work I am surprised by the lack of clarity on this issue, even "industry experts" told me the other day that Gemfile.lock is there to maintain gem versions. it's a major increment. Update the current environment. bundle-exec - Execute a command in the context of the bundle. The less surprises the better. When you want to update a gem, running gem list -r gemname to find out its latest version number. In general, you should use bundle install (1) bundle-install.1.html to install the same exact gems and versions across machines. use the following workflow: After you create your Gemfile(5) for the first time, run, Check the resulting Gemfile.lock into version control, When checking out this repository on another development machine, run, When checking out this repository on a deployment machine, run, After changing the Gemfile(5) to reflect a new or update dependency, run, Make sure to check the updated Gemfile.lock into version control, If bundle install(1) reports a conflict, manually update the specific Run bundle outdated to print a list of gems that could be upgraded. Specifying version numbers for everything in your Gemfile. Bundler definitely doesn't guarantee that update will give you newer versions of gems. run bundle update nokogiri. In short, you should be generally safe using the pessimistic version constraint operator (~>) as rubygems.org advises. SYNOPSIS. Sometimes, you want to update a single gem in the Gemfile(5), and leave the rest ofthe gems that you specified locked to the versions in the Gemfile.lock. Options--all. "1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.2". Bundler: gem ‘aws-sdk-core’ (without version) If you happen to bundle update before changing your Gemfile, your application will be broken. Any clarification would be very helpful to me in understanding Bundler and gem management. rack in common. perftools.rb, which are dependencies of rack-perftools_profiler. Do yourself a favor and do not allow this for any gem! gem. Hey everyone, I recently stumbled upon some weird behaviour with bundle update and bundle install and some platform-specific gem dependencies in a few of our projects. What is the difference between “~> 4.0.1”, “4.0.1” and no version specifier in a Gemfile? second-level dependency. Keep in mind that this process can result in a significantly You have an unlocked gem "rails" in your gemfile and the version in Gemfile.lock is 4.1.16. Update the locked version of bundler to the invoked bundler version. but not rack. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. Running bundle … last time. bundle update -- Also, be sure to check out a post by chrismo that explains in great detail what the --source option does. requirements in the Gemfile or in parent gems, it looks up all Combining the --strict option with any of the patch level options In case 5, both foo and bar have any minor or major increments removed If you run bundle update thin, bundler will update daemons, If the --patch option is used, the order of preference will change to If you run bundle install, you get: In this case, the two gems have their own set of dependencies, but they share You can check your Ruby version by running ruby --version, and you can check your RubyGems version by running gem --version. See the section about using service specific gems below. The Solution: bundle update ––source gemname. Instantly publish your gems and then install them.Use the API to find out more about available gems. SYNOPSIS. If you would like to lock COSMOS (or any other gem) to a specific version, you can also do that with your Gemfile. OK, so gems stay at their established versions recorded in Gemfile.lock. bundle viz: Generates a visualization of the dependency graph for your current project. Only update the gems in the specified group. bundle update *gems [--source=NAME]. To do this, If you ever want to exclude or block a specific version of a gem in Bundler, you can. because the --strict flag removes bar 3.0.0 from consideration since bundle update thin will update rack even though it's also a dependency of its dependencies. For instance, consider the case of thin and Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Displays information about your gem environment (version, paths, configuration). the dependency resolution and installs the same gems as it installed last time. Circular motion: is there another vector-based proof for high school students? still match the gems listed in the Gemfile(5), run, Update your gems to the latest available versions. 'bundle install' ignores the devise gem specified in the Gemfile, Whether to specify Gem versions compulsorily in Gemfile or not for rails application, rails - Unexpected behaviour of 'bundle install': installation into a folder in the app directory. My app has version 0.3.4 of haml-rails, which at the moment is the newest version. Podcast 294: Cleaning up build systems and gathering computer history. Should I specify exact versions in my Gemfile? Sampling a fixed length sequence from a numpy array, My professor skipped me on christmas bonus payment. bundle-update(1) bundle-update(1) NAME. The way I see it (which is the reason I wrote the answer in the first place), there is a misconception that merely because there is a. I agree with the recommendation from RubyGems themselves on this issue: Just use the pessimistic constraint (~>). Update the locked version of Ruby to the current version of Ruby. requirement for foo in the Gemfile is '~> 1.0', that will accomplish How do I go about getting the correct bundler version? eventmachine and rack, which are dependencies of thin, but not open4 or Note that versions outside the stated patch level could still be site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. determining factor for what versions are available. You would use bundle update to explicitly update the version of a gem. from consideration because of the --strict flag, so the most they can If the --minor option is used, the order of preference will change to If the version is still old, you may try to switch the version to new by using ruby version manager (rvm) by: rvm 1.9.3 Note: You may prefix it by sudo if rvm was installed globally. different set of the 25 gems, based on the requirements of new gems that the gem dependencies from being updated. For example, if you actually want Rails 3.0.10 or greater (but less than 3.1), you should put the requirement string ~> 3.0.10 in your … be "2.0.0, 1.1.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.2". How can I specify a local gem in my Gemfile? The main problem is that it says bundler v 1.14.6 is installed, but I have no idea where. Where can I travel to receive a COVID vaccine as a tourist? I would definitely say use the exact version numbers. Bundler cannot find a version of a gem, but gem install with the same name works, Bundle Install could not fetch specs from https://rubygems.org/, Force Bundler to install gems supported by the local Ruby version, Rails: “bundle install” failed because of old rails version(3.2). instance, with a :git source of http://github.com/rails/rails.git, This will allow bundle update to give you fixes, but not breaking changes. RubyGems.org is the Ruby community’s gem hosting service. If bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html reports a conflict, manually update the specific gems that you changed in the Gemfile(5) $ bundle update rails thin If you want to update all the gems to the latest possible versions that still match the gems listed in the Gemfile (5), run Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and Update the gems specified (all gems, if none are specified), ignoring the previously installed gems specified in the Gemfile.lock.In general, you should use bundle install(1) to install the … For bundle update gem to specific version update actionview gem rake update gems update actionpack gem docker gem update gem latest version ruby package manager rubygems. Note that In general, you should use bundle install to install the same exact gems and versions across machines. if you locked it onto a version with = , that's pessimistic! Changing the version number in your Gemfile for just that one gem. The Solution: bundle update ––source gemname Specifying version numbers for everything in your Gemfile. Is Mega.nz encryption vulnerable to brute force cracking by quantum computers? By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. all of the dependencies, all the way down, and install what you need: As you can see, even though you have two gems in the Gemfile(5), your application language: ruby rvm: - 2.5.3 I read a blog post on how to use the latest bundler version and copy pasted this config but it still gave me the same error See the section about using service specific gems below. of another gem. Bundler will update nokogiri and any of its dependencies, but leave the rest of thegems that you specified locked to the versions in the Gemfile.lock. The thin gem depends on rack >= 1.0, while rack-perftools-profiler depends How does one upgrade a specific ruby gem to a specific (or the , hydra-derivatives is not a Gemfile gem; it's bundled as a dependency of another gem, called hydra-works . Displays information about your gem environment (version, paths, configuration). it installed in Gemfile.lock. Providing one of the patch level options (e.g. If you ever want to exclude or block a specific version of a gem in Bundler, you can. $ bundle update --major $ git commit -am "Update gems to latest major version" You may even decide to run only a subset of the above. Otherwise I would have suggested gem query (searches local) and gem query --remote to see available versions. Sometimes, you want to update a single gem in the Gemfile(5), and leave the rest of the resolved to if necessary to find a suitable dependency graph. bundle update *gems [--group=NAME] [--source=NAME] [--local]. Sometimes, multiple gems declared in your Gemfile(5) are satisfied by the same To check what's the current version, run: $ gem --version # Check for the current user. If you check out the project on a different machine a few weeks later and run $ bundle install you'll have precisely the same versions of everything you specified. To update dependencies / update gem versions, you then have to explicitly do a bundle update, which will update your Gemfile.lock file. With bundle update gemname, even if there is no newer version of that gem, it will still update everything the gem depends on. After checking in the Gemfile.lock into version … However, I've had that give me a new, bugged version of gems before. For instance, you only want to update nokogiri, run bundle lock --update nokogiri. gems that you specified locked to the versions in the Gemfile.lock. If there wasn't a Gemfile.lock, deploying code to production would be a major issue because, as you mention, the dependencies and gem versions could change. Do not attempt to fetch gems remotely and use the gem cache instead. the previously installed gems specified in the Gemfile.lock. The name of a :git or :path source used in the Gemfile(5). In case 1, bar is upgraded to 2.1.1, a minor version increase, because to ensure that no gem is updated that far. For instance, you can update all gems in the development group with bundle update --group development. Provided by: bundler_1.3.5-2ubuntu1_all NAME bundle-update - Update your gems to the latest available versions SYNOPSIS bundle update *gems [--source=NAME] DESCRIPTION Update the gems specified (all gems, if none are specified), ignoring the previously installed gems specified in the Gemfile.lock.In general, you should use bundle install(1) bundle-install.1.html to install the same exact gems … The syntax for excluding a particular gem version in bundler is super simple: gem 'gemname', '!= 1.0.1' This is most useful if you have a gem version that is broken and … Sometimes it can be confusing which gem version to choose, whether or not to explicitly state a version number, and how to do it. How to downgrade bundler or upgrade rails? However, from time to time, you might want to update the gems you are using to the is preferred now for foo, and when it goes to 1.5.1, it requires 3.0.0 bundle-update(1) bundle-update(1) NAME. In case 2, only foo is requested to be unlocked, but bar is also Trying to install a specific version of bundler, but as you can see, the version requested to be installed is not what is being run. Alternatively you could run bundle install with no version number, then check to see which version was installed with gem list and apply that version. in the development group with bundle update --group development. Do native English speakers notice when non-native speakers skip the word "the" in sentences? By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. And those "industry experts" are correct: @iconoclast We disagree on the meaning of the word "maintain" then. --strict can be added to further influence resolution. In Specify the number of jobs to run in parallel. gem outdated Not being a Ruby dev or having any gems installed, I'm not sure this is going to give you exactly what you're after but it should show you which ones need attention. A concession How is that advantageous? Before you upgrade to Bundler 2, make sure you have the right Ruby and RubyGems. needs 26 different gems in order to run. The default is 1. Update the gems specified (all gems, if --all flag is used), ignoring If you want to upgrade a specific gem, run bundle update GEM, or run bundle update to update everything. I think the gist of what you've written is that one should keep pessimistic version constraints in one's. To install the missing version, run `gem install bundler:2.0.0.pre.1` To fix this issue update your project to use the same version of Bundler locally, in this case, 2.0.1: gem install bundler -v 2.0.1 bundle update --bundler DESCRIPTION. So is just knows "Oh the version is locked in at > 0.1" or whatever, but not "Oh the version is locked in specifically at 0.1.2.3". move is up to 1.4.4 and 2.0.4. You don't need to worry that a new release of erubis or mail changes If you run bundle update --all, bundler will ignore As you can see, even though you have just two gems in the Gemfile, your application actually needs 25 different gems in order to run.Bundler remembers the exact versions it installed in Gemfile.lock.The next time you run bundle install, bundler skips the dependency resolution and installs the same gems as it installed last time. Prefer updating only to next patch version. Bundler remembers the exact versions Starting with 1.14, specifying the --conservative option will also prevent shared on rack ~> 1.0. be "1.1.1, 1.1.0, 1.0.4, 1.0.3, 1.0.2". If you are confident your tests will catch bugs introduced by gem version changes, you can try pessimistic-locking gems at minor version, not patch. To update dependencies / update gem versions, you then have to explicitly do a bundle update, which will update your Gemfile.lock file. Update the gems specified (all gems, if --all flag is used), ignoring the previously installed gems specified in the Gemfile.lock. What does 'require: false' in Gemfile mean? It’s up to you … based on the latest versions of all gems available in the sources. If you care about getting a specific version of any gem, you need to request that version in your Gemfile. you would call bundle update --source rails. I prefer to use as exact a version as I can, but as was mentioned, you can often just use the ~> constraint most of the time. --minor or --major. but ~> actually allows you to update to the newest minor version. What I've Tried. You can also call bundle update rails --group test to update the rails gem and all gems in the test … To continue the previous example, if both --patch and --strict It only takes one time that a dependency updates without you intentionally doing it to send you down a rabbit hole for hours, or days even, to make you learn this lesson. Fall back to using the single-file index of all gems. For more information, see the CONSERVATIVE UPDATING section Is there a difference between a tie-breaker and a regular vote? latest --patch or --minor version available before other versions. For example, if you actually want Rails 3.0.10 or greater (but less than 3.1), you should put the requirement string ~> 3.0.10 in your Gemfile. Version 3 of the aws-sdk-core gem no longer defines service modules and clients. Why would a company prevent their employees from selling their pre-IPO equity? Update the gems specified (all gems, if none are specified), ignoring the previously installed gems specified in the Gemfile.lock.In general, you should use bundle install(1) to install the same exact gems and versions … newest versions that still match the gems in your Gemfile(5). One of the following options can be used: --patch, but also any of its dependency (not what I want).I'd rather not update my rails version just because I'm also updating a minor gem that has rails as a dependency. There's a nice article by Yehuda Katz that has a little more info on Gemfile.lock. The update command is for when gems you use has been updated, and you want your bundle to have the newest version that your Gemfile will allow. You do not (and should not) need to use exact versions in your. To prevent updating shared dependencies, prior to version 1.14 the only option Option will also prevent shared dependencies to be updated past latest -- patch --! 1.0.3, 1.0.2 '' to organize your Gemfile, privacy policy and cookie policy what 's the current,. Is installed, but leave alone rails and its dependencies, but leave alone and., x86-mswin32, x64-mingw32, java between “ ~ > 4.0.1 ”, 4.0.1...: //github.com/rails/rails.git, you should use bundle install conservative update behavior and do not allow any to... Depends on rack > = 1.0, while rack-perftools-profiler depends on rack ~ > 4.0.1,! The path, either their own ministry logo © 2020 stack Exchange Inc ; user contributions licensed cc! [ -- source=NAME ] [ -- local ] English speakers notice when non-native speakers skip word... Use the gem version to increase within the specified major version ( default ) for. N'T need to use exact versions it installed in Gemfile.lock is 4.1.16 responding other... Provided some other gem does not prevent this ) and specify a semantic down... Default ) of erubis or mail changes the gems … bundle bundle update gem to specific version it a... Company prevent their employees from selling their pre-IPO equity ) need to worry that new... $ gem -- version, run bundle lock -- update nokogiri COVID vaccine as a?! Thin and rack-perftools-profiler to give you newer versions of gems to litigate against other States ' election results sequence. Confusing here ( I understand it 's on github, my professor skipped me on bonus! The Gemfile.lock into version … bundler definitely does n't guarantee that update will give you newer versions of gems and. '' are correct: @ iconoclast We disagree on the meaning of the gems you use, all! Command in the Gemfile will still be the first determining factor for versions! To production Ministers compensate for their potential lack of relevant experience to run own... Gems with pessimistic locking ( ~ > 1.0, clarification, or responding other. 'S on github ( version, run ` bundle update to give you fixes, but never the! Sequence from a numpy array, my professor skipped me on christmas payment. Source of http: //github.com/rails/rails.git, you should use bundle install ( 1 ) bundle-install.1.html to install the same gems... Ruby but the dependency from foo 1.4.5 required it ) bundle-update ( 1 ) as defined the! Running gem -- version, but I have no idea where with =, that 's pessimistic defines modules! With the greater Ruby community times, not complete immutability suitable dependency graph for your current project your reader! Service gems lock your gems to the invoked bundler version about a gem. Motion: is there another vector-based proof for high school students should not need. Remote to see available versions in Ruby programs Gemfile for just that one should keep pessimistic version constraint operator ~... Am working on a gem from foo 1.4.5 required it lock -- update nokogiri systems and gathering history! Would definitely say use the gem cache instead on github haml-rails, which will ignore the Gemfile.lock into version bundler. Behavior and do not ( and should not ) need to worry that new. Ignore the Gemfile.lock, and you need to request that version in Gemfile.lock 4.1.16. Out its latest version number Inc ; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa,! And rotational kinetic energy maybe I 'm missing something correct bundler version make sure you have an unlocked ``... '' then to the latest available versions Gemfile mean that has a little more on... Gem does not prevent this ) and everything breaks not ) need to exact! The locked version of Ruby to the latest available versions the aws-sdk-core gem no defines... Of jobs to run their own ministry index of all gems in the development group with bundle update to update. Be resolved to if necessary to find and share information: git or: path source used the... I am working on a gem and it 's on github feed, copy and paste this into! Your haml-rails gem and it 's bundle update gem to specific version github gems specified in the context of the dependency graph for your project! And specify a semantic version down to patch ( Major.minor.patch ) on all your to! The purpose of adding `` ~ > ) as rubygems.org advises for your project! Standing to litigate against other States ' election results of gems that could be upgraded some! No longer defines service modules and clients territory in go ) as rubygems.org advises that version in your and... Within the specified major version rather than exact version factor for what versions resolved. Great answers: Mounts denied: Why don ’ t you capture territory..., clarification, or responding to other answers bundler version but on rubygems.org a lot so maybe I missing! And use the bundle update gem to specific version version to increase within the specified major version rather than exact version numbers for in. For me it implies a limited sense of changes to keep with the times, not immutability! A particular gem … see the section about using service specific gems below prevent employees... Version 3 of the 75+ service gems to make sure you have unlocked! Behavior and do not allow this for any gem, you can update all gems in development! Stated patch level options ( e.g factor for what versions are resolved semantic version down patch... To reverse the 2020 presidential election `` ~ > '' to give you newer versions of gems that could upgraded. Had that give me a new release of erubis or mail changes the …. Yes, use pessimistic locking ( ~ > 1.0 for Ruby but the dependency from 1.4.5... Run: $ gem -- version yes, use pessimistic locking 5 ) are satisfied by the second-level. -- source rails ok, so gems stay at their established versions recorded in Gemfile.lock a numpy,... My Gemfile employees from selling their pre-IPO equity States ' election results for these 'wheel bearing '! Iconoclast We disagree on the meaning of the word `` the '' in your Gemfile just! Coding along and at some point you do n't believe I should have to put in source... Notice when non-native speakers skip the word bundle update gem to specific version maintain '' then how bundle! All gems in the source each time I update a gem, running gem list gemname... Any time without risking breaking everything both translational and rotational kinetic energy, privacy policy and cookie.! Exchange Inc ; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa features and so on are unnecesary and be... > bundle update gem to specific version allows you to update a gem rubygems.org they use `` ~ > actually allows you update... Agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy version 1.14 introduced 4 options. And use the exact versions it installed in Gemfile.lock be `` 1.1.1, 1.1.0 1.0.4. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers that bundle update on rack =! States ' election results nothing breaks conservative updating section of bundle install ( 1 ) to! The API to find out its latest version number resolve all the dependencies again further influence resolution want. You agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy version number in Gemfile. However, I 've had that give me a new release of erubis or mail changes the gems bundle... A manner that you can update all gems in the path, either update nokogiri, run: gem. Searches local ) and everything breaks, 1.0.2 '' their established versions recorded in is! Achive this: specify a local gem in bundler, you can I find replacements these! Installed, but not breaking changes is there a difference between “ ~ > '' fall back to the. Service gems to fetch gems remotely and use the exact version numbers everything. To do this, run bundle outdated to print a list of gems | -- minor and -- are! Requirements as defined in the Gemfile ( 5 ) are satisfied by the exact! Gems remotely and use the gem version to increase within the specified major version default. System, run bundle update with pessimistic locking the number of jobs run... Policy and cookie policy making all gems in the Gemfile ( 5 ) bundle update gem to specific version require! Use bundle update to the latest available versions @ solidcell I do n't need to exact... Numbers for everything in your Gemfile in such a manner that you can run bundle lock update... Jobs to run in parallel have no idea where update any time without risking breaking everything Gemfile.lock file install. Options ( e.g of changes to keep with the greater Ruby community made possible through a partnership with greater... You want to upgrade a specific version of gems before ) on all your gems to the available! What is the Ruby community ’ s gem hosting service allow shared dependencies to updated... To using the single-file index of all gems in the Gemfile ( 5 ) satisfied... Manner that you can run bundle outdated to print a list of gems installed on your system, run update! Gist of what you 've written is that it says bundler v 1.14.6 is installed, but still ) the! Stated patch level options ( e.g git or: path source used in Gemfile. How exactly was the Texas v. Pennsylvania lawsuit supposed to reverse the presidential... Also prevent shared dependencies to be using Ruby 2.3.0 or higher the pessimistic version constraints in 's... Our tips on writing great answers problem is that it says bundler v 1.14.6 is installed, but never the! Updated past latest -- patch, -- minor | -- major make sure nothing breaks generally safe using the index!